INTERNATIONAL INVALIDITY OF BENAMI
TRANSACTIONS
The Constitution is a plethora
of dusty tomes
That makes no diurnal or nocturnal revelance
Within the hamlets of our dusty homes.
Or hold much significance
to the voiceless millions.
It must how'er be moth-balled
and turned periodically
To be kept most up to datedly validity.
Anglo-Indian community at the
middle of the 20th century
When the British were leaving THE JEWEL OF THE CROWN behind
In the custody of the natives
while taking
with them their fair faced sons
Even as they brazenly left behind their darker ones
Yet considerately
if underratedly made provisions
For their back door entry into the representative republican pageantry
through patently
unfair 'nominated' backdoor privileged entry.
But much population of Anglo-Indians
Can
be counted in the population today?
To warrant a wholly unfair advantage of two says
Either ayes or nays let us say?
There is no gainsaying that the
constitution
Is not a frozen frieze to be worshipped circa nineteen fiftyca!
Curtesy Ambedakar and Co forever.
There is need for de-regulation
of constituencies
As well as a relook into other nuances
Of what is redundant and what is abundant
To the need of
finances
To still swear by socialism, secularism and the rest of anachronisms.
THAT DON'T EXIST IN THE HAMLETS
OF OUR DUSTY HOMES!
That the constitution does not
distinguish
Between sections of citizens
Is a patently false note of entry.
It does and does and does
In
three distinct sections and articles of the same said
CONSTITUTION.
Yet it is also as patently true
and true and true
To be renewed over and again anew
THAT ALL CITIZENS ARE EQUAL BEFORE LAW!
AND THAT INCLUDES EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES
TO ALL CITIZENS.
sO WHAT ABOUT THIS BLATANT BYPASS
BEING
AFFORDED TO CERTAIN FAMILIAL CLASS
THAT THEY MAY CHUTE UP THE FREEWAY
BYPASSING THE SPIRAL STAIRWAY
AND NEVER LOOKING
DOWN INTO THE STAIRWELL
BECAUSE certain PRIVILEGED INDIVIDUALS
HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS THAT ARE NOT RIGHT
To
earn a vicarious backdoor fast tracked brazen entry
Into highest constitutional berths
Without so much as earning their
spurs
Or doing much of running the heats
On the beats of political experience
TO BE EARNED BY SHEER DINT OF
TALENT
AND WORN AS A BADGE OF HONOUR AFTER ARDUOUS DINT
OF INTEGRITY GLAZED ENDEAVOUR.
But by benami transactions
Of
a person whose name even
Is not a dead legal cert
Certified or verified or ratified to date
BY ANY CONSTITUTIONAL
AUTHORITY YET
THEY LAUGHED J M LYNGDOH OUT OF
TOWN
AND LAUGHED AT HIM TILL THEIR DENTURES FELL OFF
AND JAWS GOT SAWED OFF!
AND HE WAS FORCED TO BACK DOWN
FROM
HIS STERLING POSITION THAT THE RETURNING OFFICER
MUST BE MADE 'OFFICIAL INCHARGE OF REJECTING APPLICATIONS'
IF FOUND
WANTING.
YET NOBODY SINCE OR THEN
HAS
TAKEN THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CHECKING
ON THE STATED CREDENTIALS OF THE CHOSEN HIGHEST SELECT!
IF THIS NOT A CONSTITUTIONAL CHICANERY
WHAT
IS?
So we must have an urgent update
On
matters constitutional.
Agreements treaties and IOU's
SIGNED
AMONGST INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND RELATIONS
MUST BE RATIFIED AND CERTIFIED AND AUTHENTICATED.
IF BY LACK OF DELIGENCE
AND
CONSTITUTIONAL DELINQUENCY
WE PUT UP A PERSON WHOSE NAME EVEN
IS NOT A GIVEN
BY NOTARIZED OR REALIZED OR ACTUALIZED
SAY
OF CERTIFICATE
AUTHENTICATED AFTER DUE VERIFICATION
HOW WILL IT HOLD UP TO INTERNATIONAL SCRUTINY?
Saying so and so is INDIRAMMA
KODALU
May work very well within our GODALU
But will it stand its head up and be counted
Under the harsh light of
scrutiny of internation court of justices
Or multilateral trade ratifications.
As this issue has such wide and
varied ramifications
And worrisome implications
It would do well to scrutinize all relevant documents
and authenticate
them before oath taking ceremony
or serving high tea in the Rashtrapathi Bhavan.
How and who shall countenance
That
we are so lacking in constitutional application
As to simply check up on documentary evidence
THAT WHAT IS SAID ON TELEVISION
IS WHAT IS CERTIFIED BY NOTARY!
SO CAN THESE BE ASKED TO BE PRESENTED?
TO THE PRESIDENT.
JAYASHREE PYEDIPPALA VEMULAPALLI